Today, there's certainly not something wrong with this, I only think that writers who are doing this are passing up on potential traffic and/or clients. Such source boxes is only going to gain their site ranks in a...
I run an article service on my site, and I am seeing an increasing number of articles being published, solely for the backlink given in the Resource Box. This is probably as a result of growing number of PLR articles and material that is becoming available.
Now, there is certainly not something wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are missing potential traffic and/or clients. Linklicious is a tasteful library for more concerning where to see this enterprise. Such resource boxes will only benefit their site rankings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out can be as follows.
Much of the traffic to my post directory comes from search engines, by people searching for information on a specific subject. Now, this user types within their key-words, clicks on the search field, and is given a listing of related sites. They selected one, and are taken to the author's article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, believe 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource field by the end of-the article to see what else they've to say on this issue. There, they locate a link to your site advertising mobile ringers. May be the reader going to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not so likely. They wish to check out snowboarding, not personalize their phone. In my opinion one of three things can happen then:
The audience leaves the entire site in disgust.
The reader clicks on a link to some relevant report.
The reader clicks on a relevant Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual marketing) offer.
They do not click the author's source link. That's a possible client dropped, quite probably permanently.
Yes, put a link in to your website in the source box, but many article directories let many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s related to the article subject as well, and ultimately put it in first, before you lose the client. To discover more, please check-out: does linklicious.me work.
'But my site does not have such a thing to do with that matter about it'!
You can add something that does. If you know anything at all, you will likely need to compare about linklicious tips. Increase an article service, and have the source field saying 'To read more articles on this subject, click the link.' Add a web service, and have the writing say 'To view links to web sites with this issue, just click here.' Or just head to ClickBank, try to find related jobs, and have a link to them, together with the link saying something such as 'If you prefer to learn more on this issue, purchase this product.' Ultimately, not a direct connect to the merchandise, but a cloaked or redirected one.
Using this method, you still get that link to your website that you were after initially, but, moreover, you have the chance to make money from the reader in a fresh way. A situation. Plus, you do not look like someone basically posting purchased content on any matter just for the sake of the backlink it'll give you. A much more professional look. Is not it worth taking the time to produce better use of your resource field?. Clicking is linklicious worth it maybe provides suggestions you can tell your cousin.